1 Corinthians 10:3

Authorized King James Version

PDF

And did all eat the same spiritual meat;

Original Language Analysis

καὶ And G2532
καὶ And
Strong's: G2532
Word #: 1 of 7
and, also, even, so then, too, etc.; often used in connection (or composition) with other particles or small words
πάντες all G3956
πάντες all
Strong's: G3956
Word #: 2 of 7
all, any, every, the whole
τὸ G3588
τὸ
Strong's: G3588
Word #: 3 of 7
the (sometimes to be supplied, at others omitted, in english idiom)
αὐτὸ the same G846
αὐτὸ the same
Strong's: G846
Word #: 4 of 7
the reflexive pronoun self, used (alone or in the comparative g1438) of the third person, and (with the proper personal pronoun) of the other persons
βρῶμα meat G1033
βρῶμα meat
Strong's: G1033
Word #: 5 of 7
food (literally or figuratively), especially (ceremonially) articles allowed or forbidden by the jewish law
πνευματικὸν spiritual G4152
πνευματικὸν spiritual
Strong's: G4152
Word #: 6 of 7
non-carnal, i.e., (humanly) ethereal (as opposed to gross), or (daemoniacally) a spirit (concretely), or (divinely) supernatural, regenerate, religiou
ἔφαγον did G5315
ἔφαγον did
Strong's: G5315
Word #: 7 of 7
to eat (literally or figuratively)

Analysis & Commentary

And did all eat the same spiritual meat—The pneumatikon brōma (πνευματικὸν βρῶμα, "spiritual food") refers to the manna God provided in the wilderness (Exodus 16). Paul calls it "spiritual" not because it was immaterial, but because it was pneumatikos—supernaturally provided, symbolically significant, pointing beyond itself to Christ as the true bread from heaven (John 6:31-35).

Again, the emphasis is all—every Israelite ate the manna, just as every Corinthian participates in the Lord's Supper. This universal participation created covenant obligations and accountability. The manna sustained physical life but also tested obedience (Exodus 16:4)—would they gather only what God commanded, or act presumptuously?

Paul is building toward a sacramental warning: the Corinthians eat Christ's body at the Lord's table, but this doesn't make sin safe. Israel ate God's provision yet provoked His wrath. Sacramental participation demands corresponding sanctification.

Historical Context

The manna was central to Israel's wilderness identity—daily dependence on God's provision. Rabbinic tradition elaborated on the manna's miraculous properties, and Jesus explicitly connected it to Himself (John 6). Paul uses this shared typology to show that spiritual food doesn't prevent spiritual failure. The parallel to the Eucharist would have been clear to Corinthian Christians.

Questions for Reflection

Related Resources

Explore related topics, people, and study resources to deepen your understanding of this passage.

Topics